Labour faces backlash over revised plans for workers’ rights

Date:

The Government has come under pressure after ministers abandoned their commitment to introduce day-one protection against unfair dismissal, prompting discontent among Labour backbenchers. The decision marks a departure from the party’s manifesto pledge, which had promised immediate safeguards for workers starting new roles. Instead, ministers now intend to introduce the right after six months of service, while other day-one provisions, such as statutory sick pay and paternity leave, remain scheduled for April 2026.

++ Three ancient Egyptian tombs discovered after millennia

The change has sparked frustration among several Labour MPs and trade unions, who argue that the decision undermines the party’s commitment to strengthening workplace protections. Figures including Andy McDonald and Rachael Maskell criticised the move, insisting that employers have “nothing to fear” from day-one rights and warning that the revised proposal weakens essential safeguards for employees. Others accused Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves of capitulating to business concerns, arguing that the shift represents a clear breach of the Labour manifesto.

Ministers, however, defended the compromise, with Business Secretary Peter Kyle stating that it reflected a balanced agreement reached between employers and trade unions. He maintained that the adjustment was necessary to ensure the Employment Rights Bill progresses through Parliament after a prolonged stand-off between the Commons and the Lords. While business groups welcomed the revised six-month qualifying period, they also noted ongoing concerns surrounding wider elements of the legislation, including industrial action thresholds and provisions for seasonal workers.

++ Rare dusky shark attack linked to human feeding behaviour

Despite support from some industry representatives, the Government continues to face criticism from both political opponents and union leaders. Unite’s Sharon Graham argued that the Bill had been reduced to “a shell of its former self”, warning that repeated concessions risk eroding workers’ confidence. Meanwhile, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch labelled the decision “another humiliating U-turn”, claiming the legislation still contained measures that could hinder economic growth.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Share post:

Subscribe

Popular

More like this
Related

Rachel Reeves faces scrutiny after tax-raising Budget and OBR leak

Rachel Reeves is under mounting pressure following a Budget...

A new metric that could simplify the way we track our health

Life is undoubtedly more than a string of statistics,...

Aerosmith return with new music in collaboration with yungblud

Aerosmith have returned with their first new music in...

Alex James likens himself to a monk on cotswolds farm

Alex James has quipped that he is “basically a...