Hamas finds itself at a crossroads, torn between its militant identity and the growing pressure to surrender arms for the sake of Gaza’s survival. As the group faces the devastating toll of Israel’s military response and mounting international condemnation, its leadership must decide whether to accept exile and disarmament in exchange for peace. Once driven by an ideology of resistance, Hamas now risks becoming politically irrelevant in a conflict that has already cost tens of thousands of Palestinian lives and left Gaza in ruins.
++ Andy Burnham emerges as possible challenger to Keir Starmer amid Labour unrest
The movement’s internal contradictions are stark. While its 1988 Charter calls for the full liberation of Palestine “from the river to the sea,” it also recognises, albeit indirectly, the possibility of coexistence through a two-state solution. This ambiguity leaves room for compromise but also fuels division within the group. Senior leaders based abroad, particularly in Qatar, have reportedly shown willingness to accept ceasefire proposals, while those in Gaza remain committed to armed resistance. Such fractures underscore the organisation’s struggle to redefine its purpose beyond warfare.
Recent diplomatic efforts led by the United States, Egypt, and Qatar have focused on securing a ceasefire and the release of the remaining Israeli hostages. In return, Hamas would be required to disband and disarm, effectively ending its control over Gaza. The proposal, though backed by Israel and welcomed by several international actors, faces strong resistance from within the group. Many of its members, accustomed to decades of conflict and ideology rooted in martyrdom, view any disarmament as surrender rather than progress towards Palestinian statehood.
++ Why giraffes have spots – the fascinating science behind their striking patterns
Meanwhile, the situation on the ground continues to deteriorate. Israel’s ongoing offensive, coupled with reports of widespread famine and displacement, has deepened the despair among Palestinians and fuelled further radicalisation. Even if Hamas were to vanish, other militant factions, some already operating independently with Iranian support, would likely fill the void. Without credible peace talks and tangible steps towards a viable Palestinian state, the cycle of violence risks perpetuating itself, leaving both sides trapped in a conflict without resolution.
