Ecuadorians headed to the polls on Sunday for a closely contested presidential run-off between incumbent Daniel Noboa and left-wing challenger Luisa Gonzalez, in a nation gripped by escalating drug-related violence. President Noboa, 37, secured a narrow lead in February’s first round but fell short of the outright majority needed to avoid a second contest. With the country now facing record levels of crime, this vote comes against a backdrop of deep public anxiety. In a stark sign of the national mood, Noboa declared a 60-day state of emergency in the capital Quito and several provinces on the eve of the election.
++ Terrifying parasites you never want to encounter
Once one of Latin America’s safest nations, Ecuador has been transformed by cartel activity into one of the region’s most dangerous. Killings linked to gang rivalries over cocaine trafficking routes have become common, with the country averaging one homicide per hour at the start of the year. Noboa, the guitar-playing son of a wealthy banana tycoon, has positioned himself as a hardliner on security. He has deployed soldiers to patrol the streets, invited US special forces into the country, and routinely wears a bulletproof vest while leading high-profile operations.
In contrast, 47-year-old Luisa Gonzalez, a former lawmaker and single mother, has framed herself as a champion of the working class. Running on a platform of social inclusion and economic support, Gonzalez promises policies such as affordable loans for single mothers and improved opportunities for the poor. She is allied with former president Rafael Correa, a divisive figure now living in exile in Belgium after being convicted of corruption – a ruling he claims was politically motivated.
++ Guterres condemns Gaza crisis as “Killing Field” amid aid dispute
The outcome of this election could determine whether Ecuador deepens its ties with the United States and maintains its security-heavy stance under Noboa, or pivots to the left with Gonzalez, signalling a potential reorientation in foreign and domestic policy. With only a slim margin separating the candidates in the first round and millions of votes still in play, political analysts warn that a tight result may fuel disputes and undermine the legitimacy of the winner. “If the difference is very small, the government will be born with a problem,” warned Simon Pachano of the FLACSO social sciences institute, “and that makes governing all the more difficult.”
